Thursday, June 10, 2010

Roaring Fork Watershed Summit Notes - June 10, 2010

Group 7 and 11: Sharon Clarke, Sandy Jackson, Ken Kolm, April Barker, Dee Malone, Amanda Barker, Jeremy Heiman, Chris Sturm, and Matt Kondratieff

What are water-related threats, issues, or concerns in the Roaring Fork Watershed that affect your sphere of influence or concern you the most?
  • Need to determine what is sustainable
  • Land use conversion from agriculture to urban and the groundwater implications of these conversions.
  • Our river corridors are filling up with people.
  • The groundwater recharge area above Aspen (Northstar Area) sustains the RF. Need to protect and restore this are to ensure that it can function as well as possible.
  • Loss of connectivity between the uplands and riparian areas
  • Issue of leaky ditches and how improved efficiency can influence groundwater supply
  • Identify beneficial uses and how much water we need to meet these uses.
  • Lawns are very water consumptive; which leaves less water for groundwater recharge.
  • Identify what are the best uses of available water.
  • We have a disconnected river system.
  • Urban/rural difference in value of houses versus hay meadows
  • Protection of Open Space is needed because that is why people want to move and visit here.
  • Loss of cottonwood galleries; cottonwoods along ditches provide good habitat
  • Education-people need to understand connection between land use and our rivers
  • Need to have more people involved from the ag community; why weren’t more ag people invited to the summit.
  • Need to manage development; laying of impervious surfaces impacts our rivers
  • Better stormwater management
  • Have communities work together to share ideas
  • Channels were formed by a range of natural variability, changes to the natural hydrograph impacts our rivers. Need to add variability to our hydrograph, a stable non-variable managed hydrograph does not translate to ecosystem health. Include both timing and quantity.
  • Baseflows are too low, causing increased icing in the winter; Sept to April spawning periods, very important to have overwintering habitat and access
  • White water park design and construction can impact fish; inhibit connectivity and access to deep pools

What are some solutions to these threats, issues, or concerns?

  • Need to identify projects that have the best chance of success.
  • Have birders and landowners meet and identify birds on their property and good habitat to attract birds.
  • Montana has public access from high water bank to bank, makes it easier to manage connectivity
  • Restoration of riparian areas to capture peak flows and slowly release
  • Look at management indicator species and work to monitor and maintain these.
  • Look at the water management/conservation from the energy perspective
  • Solutions need to come from the ground up
  • Get better media involvement
  • Have a watershed muse to translate technical info to landowners.
  • Get beyond blame to solutions
  • Protect ag
  • Continue to have these types of summits and expand to landowners

What most needs to happen to create a unified voice for the Roaring Fork Watershed?
Didn’t have time for this question.

No comments:

Post a Comment